|
|
Other health risks besides cancer are present.
Arsenic, for example, is one of the pollutants found in emissions from SRM.
Now What? So what will happen now that we know with certainty that the emissions from SRM are a threat to the health of residents who live nearby? SRM is required by law to notify residents of the associated risks if they live in the area where the maximum incremental cancer risk is greater than 10.0 in one million. That's it. SRM has to send out letters to these residents. Do they have to make any other changes? Apparently not, not now. If you live in an area with high exposure, you just get a letter telling you that. That's it. It is very frustrating, but there is hope. Rules have changed, and starting with emissions from 2018, if the emission numbers do not improve, SRM will be forced to make changes to improve them. Another frustration is that the HRA which was released in late 2020 is from 2013 emissions. It took seven years to get this information. Can we assume the conditions are the same as they were seven years ago? Has production at SRM gone up? And with any increased production is there an even greater increase of pollutants? Will it take another seven years to find out what's going on now, in 2020? It is worth mentioning that Superior Ready Mix installed a new air filtration system in the spring of 2020. This new system is for the purpose of reducing the odors associated with asphalt production. It does not decrease toxic emissions. The emissions might not smell as horrible as they did, but they are just as dangerous. Here are some statistics from the HRA. Summary of Health Impacts Cancer risk is due to arsenic (~75%), hexavalent chromium (~7%), formaldehyde (~7%), and benzene (~4%) from various emitting sources within the facility. Acute Health Hazards to the immune system are due to nickel (~49%), arsenic (~32%), formaldehyde (1~4%), and benzene (~4%) from various emitting sources within the facility.
View entire HRA * What do the numbers represent? "Zero in one million" would represent no additional health risk at all. Governing agencies have cut-offs and categories for the purpose of evaluation and determination of what actions need to be taken. It is up to any individual to decide what their personal risk tolerance is. For example, SRM's Acute Noncancer Health Hazard Index is 0.96. This number just barely under the cut-off value of 1.0, which is considered a very significant risk. So SRM was not required to notify residents about this or to make any changes. The government might not consider "really close" to the cut-off value as a risk factor, but when it's your family living there, do you? |